Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Yasir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Yasir[edit]

Prince Yasir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems that for several days the main author has been unable to add any sources to confirm the existence of Prince Yasir and his claim to a Wikipedia article. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 09:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subject isn't notable and the single-sentence claim isn't verifiable. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Without sources, this could be WP:HOAX. Couldn't find refs that would help save it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - While Iltutmish could have had other sons, I, too, can't find a source on one of this name. Smmurphy(Talk) 20:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • DElete without prejudice to possible re-creation, if notability can be established. This place-holder fails to establish any. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete - Obviously hoax this article.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Hoax article, no sources could be found to prove this person existed ever.Exemplo347 (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.