Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Minister of Lower Saxony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator has now changed his/her !vote to "merge", but since more people are leaning toward "keep", we'll go with that and then decide if we need to merge any of the info to Lower Saxony at a later time. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Minister of Lower Saxony[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Virtually no information on the office, duplication of article on Politics in Lower Saxony. Only purpose to establish use of Prime Minister in this context Dodo19 (talk) 05:37, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional Keep Perhaps as a list?--Jemesouviens32 (talk) 07:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The list is already incorporated in articles Lower Saxony and Politics of Lower Saxony with a redirect: List of Ministers-President of Lower Saxony --Dodo19 (talk) 07:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amend to Merge How about a merge with the Lower Saxony article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemesouviens32 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me. --Dodo19 (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep A valid article in its own right, would bloat the main Lower Saxony article. Needs fleshing out and expansion. Obviously the sources are there in German to do so. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Head of state --Quelle Jessen (talk) 10:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Head of government post in a major first-level division of a country. Blueboy 96 15:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Very poor nomination for deletion on this topic, regardless of the quality or lack thereof of the article in question. Carrite (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable article subject. Whatever problems are there in the article can be improved by editing and adding references. --Soman (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.