Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pricedown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 21:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pricedown[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no sourcing found whatsoever; despite being used on various notable works, the font is not itself notable. Prod declined since article was previously deleted via prod. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tending to delete No single ref, true. It has an acceptable amount of Google hits (possibly because it is included in GTA), but articles about fonts should be generally not created (with exceptions like Courier).--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 13:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.