Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pressenger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pressenger[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an app. The only available sources seem to be press releases and advertorials. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 13:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why a starting app like Pressenger wouldn't be allowed to have a Wikipedia page and apps like WhatsApp are allowed. Neutral sources have been added. - user: Jachterberg9 14:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 12:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Though there are a few new-app descriptive reviews, both those cited in the article and others visible on Google search, as well as the sponsored/PR ones, these verify existence but do not amount to WP:RS evidence of attained notability at this point. AllyD (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.