Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presbyterian Reformed Church, Epping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Presbyterian Reformed Church, Epping[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a run of the mill suburban church with no coverage [1]. seems more like a resume of its leader. LibStar (talk) 06:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Presbyterian Reformed Church (Australia) delete - ordinary, non-notable congregation. StAnselm (talk) 01:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed vote per below. St Anselm (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Entirely NN. Not keen on redirect; text at Presbyterian Reformed Church (Australia) doesn't mention church at Epping. It just has links to this article and el to church website.Bleakcomb (talk) 00:52, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I'm changing my vote. St Anselm (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.