Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premonth Calendar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 04:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Premonth Calendar

Premonth Calendar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable alternative calendar. Just one of many from a chronic calendar creator - see this page. (Calendar creator is here as User:Karl Palmen but I assume he did not create this article.) -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, notability not established from the sourcing and the article. Cirt (talk) 20:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC).
• Delete, not notable enough for Wikipedia (I even forgot about this idea of mine). It may be put in [Calendar wiki]. Karl (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

The calendar was put forward merely as an example of a lunisolar calendar specified by seven rules as follows:

(1) A rule that shows how months of 29 or 30 days are divided into lunar weeks. The days of the lunar week may be named.

(2) A rule to define a basic year of 354 days with months alternating between 30 and 29 days. The months may be named.

(3) A rule defining a leap month year, where an leap month of 30 days is added to a basic year to form a 384-day year. The leap month may be named.

(4) A rule defining a leap day year where an extra day is added to a basic year (or leap month year).

(5) A rule defining which years are leap month years.

(6) A rule defining which years are leap day years.

(7) A rule defining the when the first day of year 1 or some other chosen date occurs.

Karl (talk) 13:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.