Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premiere Livre de Pièces de Clavecin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Let'srun (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Premiere Livre de Pièces de Clavecin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly unreferenced, and notability not demonstrated. This was originally made live at Music of Versailles but in 2012 I moved it to the present title since it is nearly all about a particular set of suites by Bernard de Bury. However, that set is not the only "Premier livre de Pièces de Clavecin"; a Google search finds others than Bury's, by Jean-Philippe Rameau, François Couperin, Jean-François Dandrieu, Charles-Alexandre Jollage and Joseph-Nicholas-Pancrace Royer, so if this article is not deleted then it should be renamed with the suffix "(Bury)". This article states its source as the PhD thesis of Ruta Bloomfield (reviewed at doi:10.1017/S1478570616000129). Bloomfield previously had a bio article in Wikipedia, which was created by the same editor, both in Feb 2009. The bio was deleted in 2019 as non-notable per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruta Bloomfield. – Fayenatic London 13:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It has 6 references, could perhaps use more inline citations? It's mentioned here [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I added the IMSLP entry. Grove, and a review of a recording tell me enough about notability. One ref doesn't work for me, but I have no time to dig into it deeper. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and change title as suggested. Mccapra (talk) 16:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.