Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Chaaya: Love-nest for Animals and Birds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 23:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prem Chaaya: Love-nest for Animals and Birds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The "Love-nest for Animals and Birds" part has nothing to do with the real name of the animal shelter, which is Prem Chaaya. The article does contain links to some newpaper articles on the topic. Glittering Pillars (talk) 13:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, no independant secondary sources. More like WP:SPAM than an article. Angryapathy (talk) 14:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant Delete While I wish the shelter well, I can't see that it is notable enough. Nowhere in the league of the Battersea Dogs and Cats Home, which takes in 12,000 dogs a year. There is plenty of scope for a shelter of this nature in India, and when more notability has been achieved I would welcome a new article. Peridon (talk) 18:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate. The article's author asked me for help on how best to rewrite this article. I suggest that it be Incubated, since the editors there may be able to assist. In its present state, the article cannot stay in mainspace, since its title is wrong, it has weak sourcing, and it is poorly paraphrased from those sources. Also, the author can take some solace in the fact that articles such as this one are basically ignored; they typically get 2 or 3 page views a day, consistent with search engine bots and other automated readers, not humans. So having a Wikipedia article will do nothing towards saving any animals. Glittering Pillars (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.