Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prehistoric kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prehistoric kingdom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This upcoming Steam game from a non-notable publisher seems to fail WP:NSOFT as it does not have coverage from significant third-party news sources. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass notability criteria. Natureium (talk) 03:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's not going to pass WP:GNG. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can't review these (at work), but here are some WP:VG/RS: PCGamer 1, JeuxVideo 1, PCGamer 2, Gamepro 1. --Izno (talk) 13:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even after viewing the sources, it is WP:TOOSOON. Wait until more significant mentions appear and the article can be re-created._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it looks pretty official, lots of info here on gameplay, there're already teaser trailers out there, and there's a demo on Steam. I just think it needs a little bit of expansion is all. As for news sources, here's one User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 01:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agreeing with Lee Vilenski, article as it stands now, has a low chance of satisfying WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Woefully fails notability. No independent sources. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.