Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preganesia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 19:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Preganesia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional element outside its universe (as far as I can tell). Pcap ping 07:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Really uncontroversial. From a 2009 book for which there is nil coverage and no chance (for now at least) of an article. There is even less coverage of "Preganesia". A PROD would do just as fine. Power.corrupts (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete too trivial of a topic for reliable coverage in independent sourcing. Them From Space 03:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 18:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.