Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predikto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Predikto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NCORP. None of the claimed 'awards and recognition' are notable. The bulk of sources available are press releases, reprints of press releases or common reporting on funding or contract awards. Jbh ^Talk 03:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 03:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 03:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I'm not seeing anything obviously better. SwisterTwister talk 04:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: searches suggest that significant coverage in independent, reliable sources sufficient to meet the general notability guideline are not found. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails to meet notability criteria. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.