Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre-tertiary education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Education. Sandstein 10:47, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-tertiary education[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article contains no relevant information or citations. Maybe the term has been used sometimes but the content can be described in the general Education article and more specific articles.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to education. This probably didn't really need to come to AfD since either a merge or a redirect seem like the obvious WP:ATDs. However I'd agree that the term isn't notable enough for an article of its own right now, and a redirect seems appropriate as there is little or nothing to merge. Hugsyrup (talk) 12:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, cheeky of nominator to redirect article while afd is on, have reinstated article so that editors may readily assess it, anyway, agree that this should be a redirect as it does not appear to be a well-used term (I note by the article history that it has previously been merged than reinstated a couple of years ago). Coolabahapple (talk) 00:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- (Nominator)I redirected the article because Hugsyrup was saying that the AfD was not necessary in the case of a redirect. Before I had thought that you needed to do AfD because you would be deleting the content of the article, even if you didn't technically delete the article. Naddruf (talk) 04:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, and agree, but now it is here....Coolabahapple (talk) 05:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.