Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prateik Chaudhary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prateik Chaudhary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. He has played a role in Paramavatar Shri Krishna. I tried to redirect to Paramavatar Shri Krishna, but seems it didn't work. Most of the sources and press release and interviews. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON Baponghosh (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Okay, perhaps its WP:TOOSOON but failing GNG is senseless, yeah he’s played a role on national tv an important lead in well recognised television show, and you think he’s failed for General notability? And also did sole lead show on MX Player for that it’s second season is also coming, idc wether its deleted or not, but putting under some random guidelines doesn’t make any sense. SnehaBanik (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You should probably read up on Wikipedia's notability guidelines in order to cast well-worded input here. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Once the MX player series comes and becomes notable and when he has at least one more significant role in a notable production, please try again via AFC. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: NACTOR is not met because it needs "significant roles" in "multiple notable productions." Also lacks significant coverage to meet GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 04:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Doesn't satisfy NACTOR yet and if he does in the future, creation through AfC will be the ideal way to go. Sunshine1191 (talk) 03:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.