Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Nair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prakash Nair[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP without independent references. Rathfelder (talk) 17:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 17:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notability established by two-times winning in 2003 and 2015 the James D. MacConnell Award — the highest award conferred by the Association for Learning Environments, A4LE (they only award one school project per year); the source (A4LE's web site) confirming these two awards is (per WP:INDEPENDENT) an independent, albeit a primary source. Also, the article subject seems to be an often-cited authority on school design: his 2009 book The Language of School Design: Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools is cited 372 times, his 2014 book Blueprint for Tomorrow: Redesigning Schools for Student-Centered Learning is cited 75 times. Yamfri (talk) 01:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not suggesting he isnt notable, but the article fails the policy on living people. Rathfelder (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added a few independent references to the article. Does this alleviate your original concern? Yamfri (talk) 16:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:54, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.