Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pragma tims

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pragma tims[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All that I can find on Google is the official site, press releases, social networking sites like wikis and forums, and software profiles. All that I can find on Google News is two press releases. I found zero sources on Google Books. Fails WP:N Joe Chill (talk) 00:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Joe Chill. Nothing seems to even hint encyclopedic worthiness of inclusion on Wikipedia. The article currently has no inline citations only two affiliated external links, which as we know, is not enough to establish the required third-party coverage from reliable sources.--^Trust_Me^THROW! 01:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC) User has been blocked, refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.[reply]
Delete I can't find significant coverage. Jujutacular ^T · C 02:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I really fought to find good coverage of this one, but like Jujutacular, I cannot find it either.--Prodigy96 (talk) 04:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC) (another sock of the same banned user. Pcap ping 00:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 00:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @104 · 01:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Like the two valid votes above me, I'm just not able to find any indication that this is notable. Umbralcorax (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.