Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Practitioning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 01:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Practitioning[edit]
- Practitioning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable, poor quality article and has wider meaning than that described in article. -- Alan Liefting-talk- 07:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable neologism and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. JohnCD (talk) 10:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism, and a lot of the article may be WP:OR to boot. Lankiveil (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - even if it was better written it would be too vague for an encyclopedia.Jon Rob (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NEO at best and WP:MADEUP at worst. Chris Cunningham (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.