Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prachi Garg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Comments show a near even divide here (I am discounting the SPA). Nor is an examination of the arguments based on WP:PAG helpful as both sides are looking at the same sources and citing the same guidelines (and essay). IMO a further relisting is unlikely to bear fruit. I am declaring a hung jury and a mistrial. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prachi Garg[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. There's no assertion of notability that passes WP:N Chris Troutman (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article almost cleanup removed promotional Content and unnecessary citations.

I found many similar articles on Wikipedia but it's not worst them. Example:Veena Kumaravel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:30A3:CA70:0:0:28D8:E0AD (talk) 01:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC) — 2405:204:30A3:CA70:0:0:28D8:E0AD (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a valid rationale. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Troutman You are a scholar and moderator on Wikipedia. Why are you not helping us to cleanup this article rather than deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:30A3:CA70:0:0:28D8:E0AD (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GOLDENRULE, have notability on The Hindu. Well known author. Accesscrawl (talk) 03:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading this article and found deletion message. By reading this I have not found any promotion content here and in this article have enough known citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.196.34.242 (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC) — 146.196.34.242 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete not yet notable per WP:GOLDENRULE, WP:BIO, or WP:GNG. Significant, independent coverage from WP:RS is need to meet those criteria, not brief mentions in WP:RS about her giving a lecture, nor obvious paid puff pieces like these: [1], [2] aren't the kind of coverage required to show notability. WP:TOOSOON at best. TMG^talk 18:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GOLDENRULE, have notability on The Hindu The Economic Times. Well known author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saroj Naagar (talk • contribs) 09:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC) — Saroj Naagar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Strikerforce^Talk 20:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:ANYBIO / WP:NAUTHOR; significant RS coverage not found. SPA activity at this AfD is concerning as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Absolutely meets GNG. If it would have been a draft, I would have accepted it at AfC. Dial911 (talk) 03:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.