Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prachee Prakash Javadekar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prachee Prakash Javadekar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequate evidence of notability. The first source is a piece by her, the second no longer exists, the third does not mention her, the fourth has only a brief mention.

(The subject has requested deletion at the Help Desk; I don't consider this relevant.) Maproom (talk) 08:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per sources in the article not showing WP:GNG. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 09:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 09:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 09:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Fails WP:GNG, BEFORE and AFTER. -The Gnome (talk) 09:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice - it is possible that a case be made for her notability; but this article does not do it. (And I concur, her request that it be deleted is not relevant to our purposes.) --Orange Mike | Talk 14:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.