Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Chamber
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 February 1. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Power Chamber[edit]
- Power Chamber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Insufficient reliable sources to verify information in article —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The article has 14 different references to various episodes which show plenty to verify the information within.
Also, this AFD is not properly done, as the article itself has not been tagged by the nominator.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Keep per Ryulong. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why?. Do not vote. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- He is saying that he agrees with my statement and cannot say it any clearly than I did as to why this page should be kept.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a reason why people agree with someone. For example, if you say that you want Wikipedia to be a television channel because you'd want to watch it for a television version of articles, and if I agreed with you, I'd need to explain why I'd agreed with you. If the reason was because we just didn't to read them and just watch, I'd have to state that reason. I'm not saying whether I really think a television version of Wikipedia would be good, but I'm just making up an example to illustrate my point. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- He is saying that he agrees with my statement and cannot say it any clearly than I did as to why this page should be kept.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why?. Do not vote. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This is one of those pivotal aspects in the PR universe, and unlike various other fan-base supported articles as you find within DC universes, this one actually has the proper sources and citations to back it up. No reason for a deletion. Floria L (talk) 00:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.