Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerLinks Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PowerLinks Media[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nah, not notable. Fails WP:GNG. Jsfodness (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, Technology, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very obviously it is marketing article for not notable company. It is not as per organisation notability policies like WP:NCORP of Wikipedia. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article describing the corporate structure and product range of an advertising firm. Some coverage is available, for example this bylined Startups item, but I am not seeing the level of coverage required to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 10:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.