Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poverello Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus after 4 weeks at AfD. There is some evidence of notability from local news sources. Bearian (talk) 21:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poverello Center[edit]

PROD removed; as I said in my PROD reasons, "No evidence of notability; only sources are local, and local sources aren't sufficient for notability". No need for more reasons for deletion. Nyttend (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Apparently there are multiple Poverello Centers and they are a Franciscan outreach program, lots of large centers providing food relief, homeless shelters, etc. all over the U.S. and perhaps elsewhere, I see Rhode Island, Florida,Nevada, and this one in Montana without trying. The article should really be about the national organization although there is enough coverage in reliable sources to support at least this one in Missoula and the one in Pompano Beach, probably others. That something is only known through local sources doesn't make it not notable, if that were the case, few high schools or churches would be included. Drawn Some (talk) 16:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - an article sh/could be created for the centers in general. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --- centers as a whole notable this one alone is not. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 07:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 01:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Random off topic rambling, iffy sources, thin notability at best. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If the broader organization is notable, then this should be merged into a broader article on it, not deleted. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notability is claimed. A merge of all the "Centres" into this Article would be suggested till individuals require their own Articles. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 07:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I agree with the Prod Decline'r... "local sources aren't sufficient for notability" ??? thats not policy, or a guideline. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 07:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 09:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Org might be notable, but each location isn't notable on its own. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.