Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pothanur Soccer Academy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 10:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pothanur Soccer Academy[edit]

Pothanur Soccer Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of external coverage of this institution; does not even seem to have its own website : Noyster (talk), 08:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  09:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  09:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  09:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Can't find any references discussing it aside from their own Facebook page. No change of passing WP:ORG like that. /wia /tlk /cntrb 20:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a clear WP:TNT which would be needed as the current version is not acceptable and looks like sandbox material. SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick tcs 13:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Currently fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG — Jkudlick tcs 13:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. no indication the academy has achieved anything significant in terms of competition performance nor significant coverage of itself or as a result of graduates from the academy going on to have professional careers. Fenix down (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 17:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the only evidence that this club exists (let alone being notable) is from a small Facebook page/group Spiderone 10:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.