The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Liar paradox. Owen×☎ 18:28, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable enough for a WIkipedia entry - Akamad 07:39, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to liar paradox since Martin Gardner has described it. Gazpacho 07:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless the lack of credible sources is remedied, this appears to violate Wikipedia:Verifiability --redstucco 09:40, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
