Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possible Extinction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to IUCN Red List#Possibly extinct. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Extinction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced definition/theory. Author inserted concept into IUCN Red List in attempt to make it seem plausible. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to IUCN Red List#Possibly extinct. Not notable on its own, especially out of context. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
do not delete this page. It is still being worked on and is going to be under construction for a while. Wyattford (talk) 10:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to IUCN Red List#Possibly extinct. The trivia about Tasmanian Tigers can go on the Thylacine page. Tigraan (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yup - Redirect to IUCN Red List#Possibly extinct. Elmidae (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.