Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possibility Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Letters to God. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibility Pictures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find evidence this meets WP:ORG although it isn't a new article and has been edited for several years. Dougweller (talk) 12:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: more sourcing is available here: [1], [2]. Most of it is blurbs. I don't have a strong opinion on keeping or deleting. American Eagle (talk) 02:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Letters to God. Their film Letters to God is certainly notable, but that seems to their only film. Searching suggests no independent notability for the company (if indeed it is still going). On the other hand, the two sentences in this article would probably add usefully to the article on the film. -- 202.124.73.19 (talk) 05:41, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as suggested above. Not yet notable for stand-alone article. Jason from nyc (talk) 16:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.