Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possable Future gaming handheld consoles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 06:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possable Future gaming handheld consoles[edit]

Crystal-ballism (or possably hoax material) about future games consoles Lurker 16:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am the offical creator of the article and I agree with the WP:CRYSTAL. -Andrew124

I know but i forgot to put a oringalresearch template on the top-Andrew124

This is no t a hoax this is just a possable 3 prospects of future handhelds Besides this may not alwasys be a lie you know and heres my opininon (Dont make quick judgements just find the evedience)-Andyban —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andyban (talk • contribs).

That's why I said possable hoax Lurker 16:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 16:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete violates WP:NOT, WP:NOR, and an excellent example of WP:CRYSTAL. Almost fulfills CSD category G11 as borderline advertising for Sony and Microsoft. I also wouldn't be surprised if this is a hoax, although I haven't researched any of the claims made here. Rackabello 17:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for complete lack of sourcing, and spam-like tone to much of the article. Someguy1221 18:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as crystalballery in need of a spellchecker. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per Rackabello. Also, all images are marked for speedy deletion due to lack of copyright info. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as copyright violation. Some quick web searches will verify that nearly all of the text is lifted straight from various websites. Dancter 03:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.