Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poser porn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poser porn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no documentation that this pornography genre actually exists. Sure, I can imagine how such a program could be applied to create porn, but having attempted to to google around to see if such porn actually exists (including going to a site liike xtube) I am not cinvinced that this is other than a projection of future developments meco (talk) 11:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —meco (talk) 11:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —meco (talk) 11:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence the term satisfies WP:NOTABILITY. Edison (talk) 02:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: to Cartoon porn, perhaps? -- Bobyllib (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If a potential genre or peculiar fetish of porn could exist, it probably does. That does not make it notable. Miami33139 (talk) 17:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.