Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portia Reiners (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) interstate five 22:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Portia Reiners[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. Bgsu98 (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Television. Bgsu98 (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources identified in the previous AfD discussion, which can be incorporated into the article to support WP:NACTOR notability, as well as the sources I have added. Beccaynr (talk) 00:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources identified in the previous AfD discussion. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in view of the extra references to reliable sources coverage that have been added to the article so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.