Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portaneo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 19:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portaneo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non-notable company and product. Article was written by single-issue user who is the CEO of the company [1]. I was unable to find any significant third-party coverage. Haakon (talk) 10:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - company does not meet WP:CORP. (Whether or not the primary author of the article is the CEO or a SPA is not important at AfD; what matters is that the subject of the article doesn't merit inclusion.) Frank | talk 11:45, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete': I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC) Changed to Keep: Per Thaddeus. Joe Chill (talk) 20:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Company appears to meet the GNG as evidence by the following stories: [2][3][4][5] --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, another "enterprise" tech business that publishes open source solutions for the optimization of Intranets. These things really need general-interest coverage or some kind of recognition of technical or historic importance if they can only be referenced to IT-related sources. The sources found by ThaddeusB are all IT-related, likely to be read only by people within the industry, and as such confer no more notability than hometown newspaper coverage does. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete average, even with sources. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.