Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porscha coleman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Porscha coleman[edit]

Fails all tests of notability. Repost by author who also appears to fail conflict of interest guidelines. NMChico24 14:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BIO, no evidence of notability from secondary (or any) sources. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 14:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Needs cleanup, but did anyone even check out IMDB.com? Jauerback 16:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I looked at the page. Lots of roles as 'Dancer #2' and no notable work. The BIO section on actors says she needs to be cedited with 'With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions' which I don't believe she is.Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 17:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable actress - basically an extra? Corpx 17:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Possible COI. Article's author is Porschaporsche (or something to that effect). If not, non-notable extra.--Ispy1981 17:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. This is a borderline case, and I'm probably affected by the tone of some of the delete !voters, who take her weakest roles (the sort of roles almost all actors have while "paying their dues"), then dismiss her as an "extra." A fair reading of her credits shows that she's appeared steadily on some clearly major series, so that takes care of the "notable... television" half of the BIO requirements. So are those roles "significant?" Many of them are named, and a couple of them span two episodes. And although she hasn't been in the main cast of any show, the cumulative work on multiple major series is enough for me. --Groggy Dice T | C 09:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I already speedied this as an A7, and the COI problems which seem to be involved let me tend to a delete vote here; also keep in mind that IMDB entries can be edited by the actors themselves, there is no check included as what to constitutes notable or worthy for inclusion. Lectonar 10:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind if this article gets deleted through regular process, but I don't see how it qualifies under A7. If anything, it can be accused of over-asserting the importance of its subject rather than not asserting it at all. As for IMDB, I know some people like to claim that it shouldn't be relied on, but in my experience its accuracy compares favorably to that of many so-called "reliable sources" (whose "fact-checking" consists of printing what an interview subject or publicist tells them). In any event, other sources confirm many of these roles. --Groggy Dice T | C 15:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.