Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porinju Veliyath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. So Why 13:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Porinju Veliyath[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable businessman Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A person with mentions in Forbes India, Economic times, Moneycontrol websites & one have a mass following on Twitter isn't notable? - Any person investing in Indian stock market will be surprised with this. His success stories are a part of history as stocks shoot up as soon as he invests in a particular stock. Please guide me as why he is not notable. Vivo78 (talk) 18:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If Justin Bieber albums were only sold in Canada, then he probably wouldn't have a Wikipedia page, or it would probably be salted. KMF (talk) 20:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Frivolous nomination. He has truly extensive press coverage. "Famous individual investor", "Smallcaps czar". Clearly a major player in Indian financial markets. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 04:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 11:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete -- an advertorial BLP created by a sock master; please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vivo78. I'll try a G5; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.