Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popo Iskandar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 00:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Popo Iskandar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable painter doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE. Htanaungg (talk) 03:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Significant output, plenty of references to his work online; the bar is always going to be higher for non-Western artists.Nwhyte (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My first reply for an AfD note, unsure where to reply best. This is a resonably well known Indonesian artist, and at least 1 monograph has been written about his artistic work of more than 5 decades (One cant live from 50 years of painting of one is not reasonable successful.)
While Indonesia is not an important art market, local painters with decades of success and local achievements should get a chance,。Well, I leave it up to the community to judge, dont want to put too much efforts in this one...--Mundugumor (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If a monograph on an artists exists, then the artists criterion 3: "... such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book ..." Vexations (talk) 16:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.