Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Joshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete without prejudice. Unsourced BLP. However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Joshi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Even if reliable sources to support the subject's notability could be found, I think that the article would have to be rewritten from a clean slate to meet the minimum level of quality that one can expect from Wikipedia. —Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 14:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The subject may or may not be notable, but I don't see any exceptional problem with the quality of the article that would require it to be rewritten from scratch if reliable sources are found to establish notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep many less notable people are present. so don't see any reason to specifically delete this one.Boseritwik User_Talk:Boseritwik 18:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article does need citations and (though I've never heard of her) it is relatively easy to find references asserting notability. c.f., [1]. --regentspark (comment) 21:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.