Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pontus Johannesson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GiantSnowman does mention that the subject played for the top team in a professioanl league, which some might argue is an indicator of notability, but the consensus is that the claim is fairly weak since it was a cup game against an amateur team. Since NFOOTBALL is a guideline, not a policy, I see no reason to criticize the consensus here. Sjakkalle (Check!) 21:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pontus Johannesson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Source: Swedish FA Fredde (talk) 15:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Has not played a game in the uppermost league in the Swedish football league system, except maybe exhibition/training games (Google Translate wasn't that helpful on those). - Jorgath (talk) 16:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it doesn't meet WP:GNG, could be notable but as the nominator suggested, not worth it. ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 17:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:16, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - made one appearance in the Swedish Cup in 2006, but using WP:COMMONSENSE, this player is clearly not notable. Fails WP:GNG and probably WP:NFOOTBALL if his sole appearance came against an amateur team - no evidence to tell otherwise. Giant Snowman 09:18, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails to meet either of the relevant notability criteria.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.