Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pondy Ravi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pondy Ravi[edit]

Pondy Ravi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page that I created. Only one source exists.[1] TamilMirchi (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment @TamilMirchi: I’m a bit mystified by these nominations. You say only one source exists but the article cites four. Do you mean that only one of the four really contributes to notability? If so I think I’d agree with you in respect of the sources in the article. In order to support a deletion nomination however I’d need to be confident that there weren’t other sources out there. I’m not really equipped to do a reliable search myself in Tamil on multiple articles, so it would be useful to me if you could make some statement, confirming that for every article you have nominated here you’ve done a thorough search and there are no better sources we should be considering. Other editors who can’t read Tamil might feel more confident in !voting then. Many thanks. Mccapra (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Mccapra: - I have the same worry here. Like many other articles, a deeper online look [in both English and Tamil] on this article provides more reliable sources of the subject. Neutral Fan (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete' i had to think at-least for 5 minutes to take a decision. this article is not enough and the reference link of the IMDb is also empty. nothing is there in that link. we can verify the a article on actors when IMDB writes something but there is nothing there.Author Sanju (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - enough reliable news sources exist online to save this one [1] [2] [3] [4]. A random bio here too (not worth including) [5]. Neutral Fan (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 17:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – bradv🍁 05:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 20:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Due to the addition of sources, I have withdrawn my nomination.TamilMirchi (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.