Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyglycoplex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Polyglycoplex[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's a non-notable commercial product, and the article can will never be anything other than spam. It's been (supposedly) tested, it's been reviewed, but is it used anywhere? No. The only purpose of this article is to push the product. ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure spam. The article's claims are supported only by self-referential sources. --MelanieN (talk) 04:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Product advertisement lacking reliable references. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 22:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.