Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyák Péter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Polyák Péter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was rejected at AfC for lack of notability but published by the creator anyway. The reason for rejection was "What helps for artist notability is either permanent museum collections or significant news reviews and I'm not seeing any here." The creator has since blanked his talk page. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As they said at Afc, the refs do not establish notability. I have trimmed the article of much promo. 104.163.148.25 (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt No notability established, seems to be one of the tens of thousands of non-notable artists. Article created for pure self-promotion. This article has already been created and deleted once (by the same account), and also been proposed and rejected. This is the third effort of the SPA to get this article into Wikipedia. As he will no doubt try again, I recommend we salt this page after deleting it. Jeppiz (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I could not find the first creation, just this undeletion of a draft.104.163.148.25 (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.