Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW or maybe a speedy... anyway, delete. Tone 19:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Politism[edit]

Dictionary-definition stub of a protologism. Non-germane, non-notable, and deletable per Wikipedia:NEO#Articles on neologisms and WP:DICTIONARY. --Dynaflow babble 04:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating a sibling article to the first one:

delete Direct copy from answers.com, a quick google search does seem to show some usage but not widespread (many hits are for cosmopolitism). Also, the supposed meaning of the word differs from place to place, giving the impression that it is indeed a neologism. If kept, the article should be rewritten to describe a/the phenomenon instead of just giving a definition. Examples of usage I found: 1, 2, 3 (for some reason they all are quite old, the first one from 1907) -- NathanoNL [ usr | msg | log ] 05:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a 'non-notable neologism'. Ironholds (talk) 07:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G12) as blatant copyright infringement; a copy-and-paste from the answers.com page, which is under copyright of the Answers Corporation. MuZemike 19:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.