Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political corpse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 10:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Political corpse[edit]
- Political corpse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologisms have no place in Wikipedia. Martintg (talk) 11:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The page may be qualified as original research, but the term is certainly not a neologism. --Ghirla-трёп- 12:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Although it has fewer Google hits than "random terms" Martintg (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just a turn of phrase used as a coatrack for a news bite. ~ Ningauble (talk) 12:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Randomly picked-up libel to push political POV.--KoberTalk 13:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename as Russian propaganda during Russian-Georgian war or simply as Russian propaganda and significantly extend.Biophys (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 15:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- FYI: this page was deleted on Russian Wikipedia per CSD G.10 — VasilievV 2 16:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO, blatant POV Pushing Iberieli (talk) 22:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Text discusses only one use of it? If Saakashvili gets assassinated as a result of this, that would be notable, but one nasty remark/threat is hardly significant. Simesa (talk) 23:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - We cannot create articles for every phrase that politicians "create" for one another unless there is something more substantial behind it. In this particular case, the article seems to serve more as an attempt to label Saakashvili with certain adjectives than explain the significance (which itself does not seem to exist anyway) of the phrase. --Ubardak (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Mikhail Saakashvili --TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete just another tidbit of Russian hatemongers attempting to rewrite their own language. The idiom existed for quite a while. NVO (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The idiom has been in use for ages. KNewman (talk) 19:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.