Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political Cooperative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted (CSD A7) ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political Cooperative[edit]

Seems to be a vanity article about a non-notable organization created by User:Pco, who appears to be the group's founder or someone associated with her. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 08:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Seems to be"? The organization was started by Darrow Boggiano, according to the article; and User:Pco signs herself as Darrow at least once. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 08:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable fringe party/website; from what I can tell its most prominent mentions are the Wikipedia article, the group's website, and a couple of blogs. Jayjg ^(talk) 08:26, 17 December 2006 (UTC) There is no mention of the wikipedia article at the group's website. You are a liar Jayjg! Pco 22:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I think it's quite clear that Jay says that this page and your group's page are the only major sites mentioning this group. He never said that the WP article is mentioned at your group's website. This sort of unhinged behavior contributes nothing to this project. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 03:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate vanity. MER-C 08:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a circular reference; and הֲבֵל הֲבָלִים (Eccl 1). SkierRMH,09:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just another non-notable organization trying to gain publicity with a wikipedia article.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 09:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 15:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 18:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 20:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not-notable, also per Wikipedia:Avoid self-references (the circular reference mentioned above) and per WP:SPAM - this is an advertisement, of sorts. --SunStar Net^talk 20:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We need more right-wing propaganda, nothing new, peaceful or inspiring. Pco 00:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that User:Pco has a Conflict of interest on this article. Delete, nn. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn - a combination of db-spam and db-bio --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 01:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - NN soapboxing. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 01:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - I'm fairly inclusionist and would have been willing to fight for the page as it was presented as having an association with quite a few people so I looked at the web site BUT though the web page lists many peoples names it says "To Name a Few of the Individuals and Organizations from whom we are seeking Candidates and Platform recommendations:" and also "The following is just a sample of the organizations that we wish to receive support from in the form of information and participation:". (my emphasis) To me listing all those names is simply trying to rig the search engines. Bad karma feeling - something is just not right. Maybe in the future when it actually gets some people on board then fine but let others create that page on Wikipedia not people involved with the organisation. Ttiotsw 02:13, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.