Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Policybazaar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Policybazaar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the new WP:NCORP policy standard. Fails WP:ORGIND. Routine press coverage covers funding, IPO and valuation, fails WP:SIGCOV. Reads like an company brochure. scope_creep (talk) 13:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even a company brochure would take time to explain what the company actually does. This doesn't seem to care. There are no details of its operations at all. It reads more like a brochure for the the financiers who funded it. Anyway, there is no hint of notability in the article at present. There are some Google News hits which are enough to show that the company is more than an just an empty financial shell but it doesn't scream notability to me. If there is notability (either now or in the future) then this article would not be a good starting point, so deleting it makes sense whatever the situation. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete same as when I nominated this for deletion when it was named Policybazaar India: "There are sources but they are overwhelmingly about routine business transactions such as funds moving around between companies." WP:TOOSOON if a tidy rationale is needed, otherwise WP:DRECK. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The company most certainly exists, but nothing seems to indicate why the company is notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a media to be used for hosting records of routine business announcements, nor is it intended to be an indiscriminate collection of information. This is in addition to the new NCORP guidelines, which require more in-depth coverage than Policybazaar seems to have been able to produce.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only routine coverage. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing⁺⁺ 21:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.