Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polarity (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 20:53, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polarity (game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable board game. I have not been able to find any significant, direct, detailed coverage of this topic in secondary sources. The PROD-tag was removed without explanation by Colonel Warden (talk · contribs) – which seems rather impolite but no more so than I've come to expect. ╟─Treasury Tag►Counsellor of State─╢ 18:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Was awarded the Smart Toy of the Year in 2006 by the Science Museum. Warden (talk) 19:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Though I obviously don't wish to belittle the magnitude of the Science Museum's award, the game has to have significant coverage, not simply have won a prize. This isn't WP:ANYBIO we're talking about. ╟─Treasury Tag►without portfolio─╢ 19:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See The Daily Telegraph for an example of detailed coverage. Warden (talk) 19:12, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Colonel Warden. The game won an award and is covered by third-party sources. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 04:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Colonel Warden. Edward321 (talk) 01:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.