Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polarbröd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) DARTH PANDAduel 14:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Polarbröd[edit]
- Polarbröd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unnotable bread company. "Sweeden's 3rd largest bread company" doesn't make it notable. Tavix (talk) 01:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Also has some WP:CITE issues, if it is indeed the third largest this would need to be cited. Also the list of employees seems to have some NOR issues. -Marcusmax(speak) 02:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Keep - enough sources here to meet WP:ORG and from which it can be expanded. Further material, and sources, here. TerriersFan (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs expansion, improvement and the addition of references.ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As it now appears refs can be found. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, issues can be solved by editing instead of deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per Marcusmax's turnaround. — neuro(talk) 12:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Although the article needs a lot of cleanup, it is definitely notable. I'll see if I can put something together soon. Plrk (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Just needs to be expanded, the sources indicate it's notable. ☺ Spiby ☻ 14:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.