Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poker Bunny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poker Bunny[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed through NPP. Not seeing enough sourcing to pass WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. The article is currently sourced to two podcast interviews and I didn't find anything better through WP:BEFORE, only passing mentions and unreliable sources. Spicy (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of the page and have no input concerning its deletion or retention. Thatsnotmyname2020 (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no significant coverage in reliable sources, perhaps it's too soon for an article Mujinga (talk) 20:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.