Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poke646

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Half-Life mods. (non-admin closure) — neuro^(talk) 04:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poke646[edit]

This seems to be a non-notable mod of a video game. A number of links to reviews are given - but at a closer look, they all originate from the same web site, and are (as far as I understand) user-generated content. The notability tag was added in October 2007. B. Wolterding (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Marasmusine (talk) 14:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Half-Life mods. All the references used for notability come from a single source, and I can't see anything that indicates these reviewers are on the site's editorial team. So per footnote #4 on WP:N I suggest leaving it as an entry in the list, using the "Mod of the Year" award to indicate some importance (although I note there's no citation for it yet). Marasmusine (talk) 14:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: Agree with Maramusine. The only review that looks like it might be acceptable is Yahtzee's, assuming it's really him. But without a date, there's no way to verify if this was after he got picked up by The Escapist. And even then, that's hardly enough to base an article on. Redirecting will preserve the edit history and leave things open for possible expansion. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 20:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Redirect to List of Half-Life mods. I have already proposed a merger/redirection of two other similar mods, AMX Mod X and Amxmodx geronimo, over at Talk:List of Half-Life mods#Merger proposal. MuZemike (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.