Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PointCast Media (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
PointCast Media[edit]
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PointCast Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A previous AfD in 2006 seems to have been a bit of a mess, bound up briefly with articles on other firms operating in a similar sector and then abandoned. Searches find mentions of "pointcast media" as a generic term, listings of similarly-named firms in various countries, and what appears to be a no-longer-available German-language mirror article. I am not seeing evidence that this defunct keyword ad firm attained notability. AllyD (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Nothing found. Oaktree b (talk) 23:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. NO RS Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.