Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podunk U

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili ^說嗎? 04:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Podunk U[edit]

This webcomic is hosted on Angelfire, here. No notable sites are hosted on Angelfire anyway, but just to clarify why this article shouldn't exist on Wikipedia, the webcomic has been around for wow, 4 weeks now? Wikipedia, the number one source for webcomic promotion. No. - Hahnch e n 00:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 00:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
I see no reason why this entry should be deleted. The mere domain of a site does not constitute the value of its content. On the subject of the comic's lifespan, the comic has been around for a month and will continue to be around for many years to come. Just because it hasn't existed for an extensive amount of time doesn't mean that it will die out in a matter of weeks. I think that this entry should be kept. --Icehawk24000 01:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Icehawk is the creator if "Podunk U". User may have a conflict of interest. ---J.Smith 18:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The comic may establish itself, it may not. (Most don't.) It hasn't yet. Fan1967 01:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep trust me on this one. Keeping it up here does no harm to Wikipedia. --Icehawk24000 01:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable (and month-old) webcomic. --DMG413 02:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: another nn web-comic, (a month old?!?). --Hetar 02:13, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fan1967. We aren't assuming the comic will die. Don't assume that it will live. Montco 02:42, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn-webcomic.Borisblue 04:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable and only about a month old. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 04:35, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This webcomic is trivial and unimportant. It has no large following. It has accomplished nothing other than spawning an ad on Wikipedia that I am now voting DELETE on. The El Reyko 07:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is quite a month old yet. Not notable. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 08:51, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - if somebody reads this its notable enough for me. Totally agree with Icehawk2400. Luka Jačov 15:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of logic is that? If it has a wikipedia article it's notable? It dosn't work like that. It needs to have notability outside of wikipedia first. ---J.Smith 18:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nn ---J.Smith 18:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quatloo 23:20, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not satisfy WP:WEB. No assertion of notability. Fagstein 04:16, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(esperanza) 2006-04-21 13:38

You know, you guys can just delete it now. I don't care anymore. --Icehawk24000 18:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --serbiana - talk 20:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --millosh (talk (sr:)) 23:33, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PANONIAN (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, a mere month old.--Cini 18:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --GTubio 19:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.