Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket Games Soft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pocket Games Soft[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New gaming company with no indication of notability. Article creator is likely a paid editor who's written a number of articles about dodgy companies such as deleted Tomtop.com. Zanhe (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 01:27, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Nothing claimed in the article would imply notability. No hits at all in the WP:VG/LRS custom search engine. Nothing in-depth and independent anywhere else I could find. Article has a severe case of WP:REFBOMB. Lowercaserho (talk) 01:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There are a couple "interesting" sources here (namely the money.china.com and the business insider articles), but hardly enough to satisfy WP:NCORP. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per failure of both WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.