Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocholo Gonzales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pocholo Gonzales[edit]

I believe this article has been compromised. He's one of the most notable voice over actor in the Philippines based on the websites and tv interviews. You check out his website. www.pochologonzales.com and www.creativoices.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely promotional puff piece written presumably by someone with a COI. B (talk) 02:17, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being a voice actor, it's possible that he can pass WP:ENTERTAINER if he's in several roles or has done a major of notable roles. Unfortunately, I failed to find enough reliable coverage for him. Being a fan of anime, and thus having a small interest in voice acting (or dubbing), it is with a heavy heart that I !vote weak delete, this time. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gong show 14:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It would seem to me that the in-article claims of notability are not supported. In particular, the extent of his career as a voice actor. Ducknish (talk) 20:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the information in the article are not extensively supported by secondary sources. The rest are entirely promotional. Subject is not particularly notable. Xeltran (talk) 12:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.