Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plw entertainment ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plw entertainment ltd[edit]

Promo article on small record label, with much name-dropping but little actual evidence of notability/real-world impact. Speedy declined due to the name-dropping. Calton | Talk 15:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search across major library databases revealed no mentions in indexed newspapers, magazines, or journals. --Laser brain (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CORP - not notable. Orderinchaos 11:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.